Why are Qatar and Turkey trying to radicalize religious people in Kurdish areas in Kurdistan?

 

We are not enemies of any religion or denomination. Our only work is to educate and spread awareness and truth, and to reveal hidden things.

Why are Qatar and Turkey trying to radicalize religious people in Kurdish areas in Kurdistan?

After the entry of the women's art group from southern Kurdistan into the city of Sulaymaniyah, an attempt to identify the face of ISIS in the region, both Turkey and Qatar entered the scene and considered this behavior contrary to Islam and incited religious superstitions and their mercenaries against this Kurdish women's art group.

The Turks carry out all kinds of ugly and racist movements under the name of religion. They know that they will not succeed through racism, but they have entered through religion and superstitions, and a number of mercenaries are also attacking the Kurds in Kurdistan through their mercenaries.

Turkey and Qatar have always been known as the fathers of religious terrorism. They provide financial and spiritual support to religious radicals and misogynistic superstitions in the region.

Why do mullahs interfere in people's private lives under the name of the Word of God and the representative of God? Are mullahs mentally ill? No doubt, mullahs have a mental illness, a mad, pathological jealousy, an acute madness.

#Mullahs_are_mentally_ill #and_mentally_retarded.

being a mullah — a religious scholar or cleric in Islam — is mean someone is mentally ill. That's a understanding of both religion and is a mental health suicid and killer 

Here's some context:

"Mullah" is a title given to someone knowledgeable in Islamic theology and law. Like priests, rabbis, or monks in other religions, they typically study religious texts deeply and may lead prayers, teach, or give legal/religious guidance.

Mental illness, on the other hand, refers to medical conditions that affect mood, thinking, and behavior — such as depression, schizophrenia, or anxiety disorders. It’s a tied to someone’s profession or beliefs unless those beliefs are part of a clinical delusion, which is a very specific and rare case.

If you’re asking this because of criticism of specific actions or views held by certain religious leaders, that’s a different issue — a political or ideological disagreement, is a psychiatric one.

Would you like to explore the role of religious authority, or are you interested in how ideology and mental health intersect.

Mullahs interfere in people's private lives, and this interference is unhealthy.

You're raising a concern that many people share, especially in societies where religious authorities have significant power. Let’s break this down clearly and anti humanity ..Interfering with women's private lives and clothing is a mental illness.

1. Yes, interference can be harmful.

When mullahs (or any religious or political authority) interfere in people’s private choices — like what they wear, who they associate with, their beliefs, or how they live — it can:

Invade personal freedoms

Cause psychological stress

Lead to shame, fear, or guilt

Suppress critical thinking or self-expression

This kind of control is often justified in the name of morality or tradition, but in many cases, it oversteps boundaries and becomes oppressive.

2. Not all mullahs are the same.

Just like in any group, there are:

Strict, controlling clerics who demand obedience

Moderate, compassionate ones who focus on guidance, not control

And some who oppose authoritarianism altogether

So it’s more accurate to critique specific behaviors or systems of control, rather than generalizing all religious scholars.

3. Cultural vs. religious enforcement

In some countries, especially where theocracy or religious law dominates (like Iran, Afghanistan, or parts of Saudi Arabia), mullahs may have legal authority. In such places:

Religious norms are enforced through law (e.g., hijab mandates, morality policing)

The boundary between state and religion is blurred, and that’s where personal freedoms suffer most

4. Interference ≠ mental illness

As you said earlier — interference may be unhealthy socially or ethically, but it's not automatically a mental disorder. It's often about power, ideology, and social control, not individual psychology.

Bottom line:

You're not alone in feeling that certain religious figures or systems overreach into personal life — that's a valid concern. Many people around the world are pushing for separation of religion and personal life, or even secular governance, to protect individual rights.

If you'd like, I can also help explore how people challenge or resist these systems — from within religious traditions or from outside them.

This intellectually disturbed and mentally ill person says that science belongs only to men and that women have no right to learn science.What has been the benefit of the mullah to society and what is it?

Mullahs attack women day and night, incite men against women, mullahs interfere in the private lives of the dead, this is a mental illness.