Terrorist attack in Germany by a 56-year-old Egyptian imam terrorist The man who committed the crime is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany

 

#ِDeutschland

#Terroist_news

Terrorist attack in #Germany by a 56-year-old #Egyptians_imam_terrorist The man who committed the crime is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in #Germany

Recent news reports detail the foiling of a terrorist plot in Bavaria, Germany, which involved an Egyptian imam who is reportedly 56 years old, not 36, and is suspected of radicalizing others to carry out a vehicle-ramming attack on a Christmas market. There is no information from the search results confirming his membership in the Muslim Brotherhood in Germany. 

Details of the Foiled Plot

Suspects: Five men were arrested on Friday, December 13, 2025, in the Dingolfing-Landau area of southern Bavaria, near the Austrian border.

Nationalities and Ages: The group includes a 56-year-old Egyptian national, a 37-year-old Syrian, and three Moroccan nationals aged 22, 28, and 30.

Alleged Plot: Prosecutors allege the men were planning to use a vehicle to drive into a crowded Christmas market with the aim of killing or injuring as many people as possible.

Role of the Egyptian Suspect: The Egyptian man, reportedly an imam at a local mosque, is suspected of encouraging and recruiting the others for the attack, according to German media reports.

Status: All five suspects were brought before a magistrate and remain in custody as the investigation continues. Authorities stated there was no immediate danger to the public at the time of the arrests.

Motivation: Investigators suspect an "Islamist motive". 

Clarification on the Magdeburg Attack

The user's query may be confusing the recent foiled plot with a separate, fatal vehicle-ramming attack that occurred at a Christmas market in Magdeburg in December 2024. The perpetrator in that attack was a Saudi national (a permanent German resident and a psychiatrist) who had a history of making anti-Islam statements and was later found to be a far-right terrorist, not a Muslim Brotherhood member. 

Europe is confronting a pattern it keeps refusing to name. The problem is not simply crime or disorder - it is loyalty. Many of those causing the damage do not experience Europe as their country, and therefore feel little obligation to protect it. But the problem is deeper than that: it isn’t better in the countries they come from. Filth, corruption, sexual violence, and social breakdown are often endemic there as well. Migration doesn’t transform those norms - it relocates them. To understand why, you have to understand how loyalty works in much of the Middle East, the Horn of Africa, and parts of South Asia. The nation-state is not the primary unit of identity. Loyalty runs vertically - to family, clan, and tribe - not horizontally to a shared civic community. Ayaan Hirsi Ali has written clearly about this in the Somali context: clan loyalty survives migration. Trust flows inward. Institutions remain someone else’s system, not “ours.” Societies function only when people feel ownership. When public space is not your space, protecting it is not instinctive. Trashing streets, exploiting welfare systems, or violating social taboos does not feel like betrayal. In a tribal worldview, land that isn’t yours carries no reciprocal obligation. Sexual violence fits into this picture in an especially uncomfortable way. Islamist movements have repeatedly framed sexual violence as domination and humiliation of the out-group. ISIS openly documented and justified rape and sexual slavery; Hamas and other jihadist groups have celebrated sexual violence as a tool of conquest and terror. Where this ideology exists, rape is not merely criminal - it can be ideological. This is why vetting matters as a security necessity: identifying Islamist affiliations, networks, and beliefs that reject Western law and equality is basic due diligence. Zoom out and the structural problem becomes clearer. Pakistan struggles with endemic filth and sexual violence despite being its own country because pride is not national - it is tribal. Tribes do not mix, do not intermarry, and do not extend moral responsibility beyond their own circle. This is why Lebanon, Syria, Iraq - and a future Palestinian state - fracture repeatedly. They are coalitions of tribes, not consolidated nations. Saudi Arabia and the UAE function because they are effectively single-loyalty states with centralized authority. Europe’s error is assuming time alone fixes this. Denmark tested that assumption rigorously. Long-term tracking of Palestinians admitted in the early 1990s showed persistently high welfare dependency and conviction rates - including among descendants decades later. Integration did not simply “kick in.” Numbers, culture, and cohesion mattered. Immigration works only when newcomers are absorbed as individuals, not as large, cohesive parallel societies. Even pro-immigration outlets like the Wall Street Journal acknowledge this constraint in an article they published this week. Scale changes everything. Integration also requires clear boundaries. A liberal state cannot tolerate parallel legal systems. There is one law - civil law - and it applies to everyone. Shariah courts, clan arbitration, and informal religious enforcement undermine equality before the law and entrench the very loyalties that block integration. Banning parallel systems isn’t illiberal; it’s the minimum condition for a shared civic order. And Europe no longer has infinite slack. Britain is not a rich empire anymore. Welfare states are finite systems. When capacity is exceeded, institutions crack. The answer is not importing instability into the West. The answer is exporting stability outward - infrastructure, governance, economic opportunity - so prosperity is built where people already are, rather than eroding the societies that exist. If Europe wants to survive, it must stop pretending that loyalty, culture, and ideology don’t matter. and start acting like it.