We do not recognize the #Lausanne Treaty on coexistence with the Turks, and that treaty was concluded without the will of the #Kurdish people.

 We do not recognize the #Lausanne Treaty on that living peacefully with the Turks, and that treaty was concluded without the will of the #Kurdish people.

Even the Kurds who are outside the fake borders of Turkey are threatened by the Turkish regime. An example is the Kurds of Syria and the Kurds of Iraq, who are bombarded every day by the sick paranoid regime of Turkey.

#We_consider_this_agreement_a_betrayal_of_our_nation #Treaty_of_Lausanne_Betrayal_to_the_people_of_Kurdistan

The Lausanne Agreement, which was signed on July 24, 1923, 95 years ago in the city of Lausanne, Switzerland, was accepted as the founding document of the Republic of Turkey, and this agreement is the recognition of Turkey as an independent and sovereign country, the effects of which continue to this day. continues. 99 This is the anniversary of the treacherous Treaty of Lausanne, which was a great betrayal of the nation The Lausanne Agreement was the name of the peace treaty that was signed in Lausanne in 1923 between the representatives of the Turkish Parliament on the one hand and England, France, Italy, Japan, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Portugal, Belgium and Yugoslavia on the one hand. Haiti, chaired by Esmet Inonu, and with the presence of Dr. Reza Noorbi and Hassan Saka, represented Turkey, participated in these negotiations.

During the last 100 years it has been clearly shown that living peacefully with the Turks is unacceptable.

During the last 100 years, the Kurds have faced all kinds of inhumane and immoral racist and fascist behavior in Turkey, and are still being faced by the Turks.

Therefore, we conclude that the Treaty of Lausanne was a treacherous treaty and a great betrayal of the great Kurdish nation.

The Treaty of Lausanne was a betrayal of the consciousness of the Kurdish nation. Ghazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk said in his speech about the Lausanne Peace Agreement: This agreement is a deterrent against the Turkish nation, which was prepared centuries ago for the destruction of this nation and was completed with the Treaty of Sur. - Turkey's borders were defined in Lausanne The Lausanne Treaty negotiation process began on November 20, 1922, and Turkey was asked to compromise on "capitulation" and "Armenian government". These negotiations were stopped on February 4, 1923 due to issues related to the straits, capitulation, debts of the Ottoman government, the status of the cities of Mosul and Kirkuk. Negotiations resumed on April 23, 1923. The border of Syria was also accepted and determined based on the Ankara Agreement, which was approved on October 20, 1921. Based on this, the determination of the border of Iraq was also postponed to the result of a dialogue between the Parliament of Turkey and England in the future. The border of Greece was also accepted as in the Moldova agreement, but Greece handed over the Karaghaj region to Turkey as war compensation. With this agreement, the borders of the Soviet Union, Moscow and Kars remained the same as those specified in the previous agreements. The establishment of an Armenian state in Eastern Anatolia was stopped. Capitulations were abolished in the Treaty of Lausanne. Bozjadag and Gokce Daghi islands were handed over to Turkey and twelve islands to Italy, and the rest of the islands remained for Greece. However, after the Second World War and with the withdrawal of Italy from these islands, the aforementioned twelve islands were handed over to Greece. The issue of the straits was one of the issues discussed in Lausanne, which was resolved by the Monterrey Straits Convention, signed on July 20, 1936. According to the Lausanne Agreement, foreign schools were established in the borders of the Turkish government according to Turkish laws, and the curriculum of the above schools was regulated by the Turkish government. The Fener Roman Patriarchate remained in Turkey under the condition of establishing contact with foreign churches and the privileges granted to minorities were canceled and all minorities were considered as Turkish citizens. Apart from the Greeks living in Istanbul, other Greeks were sent from Turkey to Greece, and except for the Turks of Western Thrace, all the Turks also came to Turkey, and thus there was an exchange of population between the two countries. The Lausanne Agreement has been one of the longest peace treaties. Accordingly, Turkey was freed from paying war reparations. The borders of the country were defined except for the border with Iraq, and in Turkey's view, the First World War ended. Anatoly news agency sends its news to media subscribers through the news management system (HAS) and publishes only a part of them on its website. Therefore, to receive our complete news, please call and subscribe! Related topics.

The joint chairmanship of Kurdistan Azad Hayat Pejak published a written statement on the occasion of the conclusion of the infamous Lausanne Treaty, saying: "It is necessary for Kurdistan currents to save themselves by revising their policy from the old and backward approach that has lost its credibility in the world system."

In a statement on the occasion of the conclusion of the Lausanne Treaty, the joint chairmanship of the Kurdistan Azad Hayat Party-Pajak announced: "What is a cause for concern and threat is the persistence of some regional and Kurdish forces around the marginalized approaches of the Lausanne Agreement paradigm and their insistence on stonewalling and backwardness." The existence of a democratic paradigm, or in the concrete example of a democratic nation, which can be searched more broadly and more advanced than interventionist approaches, is attractive and liberating.

The text of the statement of the joint chairmanship of Pejak is as follows:

"By carefully analyzing the current developments in the Middle East, we realize that after a century of Lausanne, Apuasa does not grow in the land of the Middle East and constantly mocks the imposed and unknown borders. The course of affairs and the extreme weakness of international institutions such as the United Nations, which are in a coma, put aside the successive collapse of international agreements concluded by the superpowers with the aim of shrugging off and abdicating responsibility for the costs against their favored countries. They also act in order to direct the forces and keep themselves active. All the mentioned cases indicate the transition stage. The important thing is that the region has not been planned based on the new demands of the capitalist system, i.e. the pre-global stage. Although the artificial borders in the Middle East were determined within the framework of the old paradigm of colonialism based on the nation-state system. Now that capitalism, regardless of all the issues of its time, does not consider the borders of the state-nation as an obstacle to its path, we are witnessing the efforts of Sykes Pico and Lawrence of the 20th century to change the maps of the region.

In such a situation, the need for self-organization within the framework of a paradigm and a rehabilitative and powerful thought is necessary to reach safe and peaceful shores in the midst of conflicts and competition of global and climatic forces.

Undoubtedly, what is a source of concern and threat is the persistence of some regional and Kurdistan forces around the marginalized approaches of the Lausanne Agreement paradigm and their insistence on stonewalling and backwardness. The existence of a democratic paradigm or in the concrete example of a democratic nation, which can be searched more broadly and more advanced than interventionist approaches, is attractive and liberating.

Therefore, it is necessary for Kurdistan currents to save themselves by revising their policy from the old and backward approach that has lost its credibility in the world system. The backwardness provides the ground for the imposition of another agreement in which the Kurds and the Kurdish community will not have a position in it. The solution to this problem is to take steps within the framework of the freedom paradigm.

Co-chairmanship of Hayat Azad Kurdistan Party- Pejak