Thia terrorist is one of Turkish intelligence services members in Syria killed kurdish girl. Nato member is terrorist

A #NATO #member has #committed  for #crimes_against humanity in Syria.  Rami -dahash is a  Turkish  intelligence  services membersThe person who raped and murdered a Kurdish girl, then cut off the girl's hair and showed that he was a member of the Turkish security forces, is a Turkish intelligence officer, lives in the city of Urfa, Turkey, and is not Syrian.

This man who killed a young kurdish lady and beheaded her with cutting her hair is called Rami Dahash, He lives in Turkey , a former member of ISIS and current Syrian Arab Army member. What is happening to Syria?

In solidarity, women around the world are braiding their hair.” Kurdish women globally are protesting after footage showed a militant displaying the braid of a fallen female fighter, Elyana Elyan joins @benitalevin to breakdown this movement.

Video: with English subtitle   This man, who rap*d and then executed a Kurdish girl in the Syrian city of Raqqa and cut her hair as a gift, is a member of Turkish intelligence. His name is Rami al-Dahash, and he lives in Urfa, Turkey.  

He was an ISIS commander in Raqqa till  2017. After the SDF took control of Raqqa, he fled to Turkey and worked with Turkish intelligence.  

He is now back in Syria again, in the city of Raqqa, but this time as part of the Syrian Arab Army. I will add his real Facebook profile in the next tweet.

women life freedom reposted

wall street journal The United States is now gambling with Kurdish lives and with its own security interest in fighting ISIS Tom Barrack’s Not-So-Excellent Syrian Adventure . The U.S. envoy abandons the Kurds, jeopardizing the anti-ISIS mission. Turkey wants to crush the Kurds . Crushing the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) serves no American interest that we are aware of, and for it to happen with such speed that the ISIS prisoners whom these forces were guarding are left in an uncertain situation with some escaping immediately, prompting the U.S. military to intervene on Wednesday to begin transferring others to Iraq—is particularly troubling. President Donald Trump still holds the sanctions card, which gives him sufficient leverage to impose a permanent halt to the violence being carried out by the Syrian regime led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has dealt harsh blows to the SDF. Yet the United States has not used this card. Current U.S. policy toward Syria is being managed by Tom Barrack, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, who simultaneously remains the U.S. envoy to Syria. The elimination of the Kurdish forces is a Turkish priority, while Ankara is the main backer of al-Sharaa. Trump spoke with al-Sharaa on Monday, and on Tuesday Barrack issued what appeared to be an obituary for the SDF when he wrote on platform “X”: “The original purpose of the Syrian Democratic Forces, as the primary ground force in the fight against ISIS, has largely been fulfilled. Damascus is now both willing and able to assume security responsibilities, including control of ISIS detention facilities.” Was it really that able, given that Damascus announced 120 ISIS prisoners escaped on the very first day of the “new regime”?! No wonder the U.S. Central Command intervened the next day to move the prisoners to Iraq, away from the hands of the al-Sharaa regime. Just one year ago, al-Sharaa was leading a jihadist force. Today, its leaders and fighters form the core of the Syrian army, which remains a heterogeneous mixture of militias with different command structures, including foreign jihadists in leadership positions. We do not know whether al-Sharaa will dedicate forces to suppress ISIS in remote areas, or whether his forces will be reliable in fighting other Sunni Islamists. Take, for example, an element in the Syrian security forces who killed three Americans last month: his ties to ISIS were exposed, yet the regime said it was unable to remove him over the weekend before he carried out the attack—apparently it was not urgent for them. The United States never faced such concern with the SDF, which fought ISIS effectively. Trump said on Tuesday: “They were doing it more for themselves than for us” … but that was useful to us. The SDF was willing to lose thousands of fighters on the ground in the course of defeating ISIS, sparing the United States from having to do so. Since then, the SDF has responded to U.S. requests regarding oil and has detained thousands of ISIS fighters, relieving other countries— especially European ones—from the burden of repatriating them. In short, the Kurds were doing the dirty work on our behalf. Are we going to betray them now? Al-Sharaa relied on irregular Sunni tribal fighters to lead the advance into SDF-controlled areas. If these fighters reach ISIS prisons first, everyone should beware. And if they—or regime forces—reach majority-Kurdish areas, there is reason to fear a repeat of new massacres. That is exactly what happened to Alawites and Druze in 2025, with very few perpetrators held accountable despite al-Sharaa’s promises. The SDF was counting on the United States to keep al-Sharaa deterred until he agreed to fair terms for national integration. It is therefore not surprising that the Kurds hesitate to dissolve the SDF and integrate their forces into the Syrian army while al-Sharaa works to concentrate power in his own hands. The United States is now gambling with Kurdish lives and with its own security interest in fighting ISIS. Either issue alone is sufficient reason to prevent another reckless offensive led by al-Sharaa. Turkey wants to crush the Kurds of the SDF, and as quickly as possible. But America does not have to facilitate that.