Video in Persian (on the right) translated to English ( on the left) by Kurd Alarm via Telegram at: t.me/KurdAlarm

 

#oh_baby_dont_cry 

persian

 #pahlavi_is_crazy

Video in Persian (on the right)  translated to English ( on the left)  by Kurd Alarm via Telegram at:  t.me/KurdAlarm
 This Kurdish woman says:

 

 “After Trump claimed, ‘We gave weapons to the Kurds,’ Reza Pahlavi supporters criticized him by writing hundreds of comments to him  and saying “ why do you give weapons to the Kurds?” , even though no weapons were actually given to the Iranian Kurds and this news is fake.
But If you were given weapons, what would you do? Your idea of struggle is dancing, singing, hugging, handing out chocolates, and praising a ‘king’ or ‘prince.’ Your peak activism is standing behind bulletproof glass, flashing victory signs in a free country , 
And now you expect weapons? You don’t understand they are not meant for people like you. Don’t even think about it it’s dangerous for you.”The gap between the “real lions of the field” and the Pahlavi Instagram fighters is not just a difference of taste, but also reflects a difference in understanding the concept of struggle. Until a political movement can emerge from its cyberspace cocoon and create a coherent organization within Iran, it will remain only a propaganda noise in the power equations. In contrast, those with roots in the soil and a history of sacrifice will always be recognized as the main players in any change in Iran’s future.
From the perspective of international observers, including the United States, groups with a coherent structure, trained manpower, and operational influence within the borders have more political weight. The fact that major powers in regional equations direct their logistical and strategic support to the “Putin on the ground” movements is an indication of this field weight. The Kurds, relying on the originality of their struggle, have proven that they pay real and hard prices for change.
​2. Monarchism; From Virtual Dreams to Twitter Realities
​On the other hand, a large part of the monarchist movement has become heavily dependent on cyberspace and satellite media in recent years. This movement, which is mainly focused abroad, is more active on Instagram and Twitter than on the streets or in organizational structures within the country.
​This activism, which has become known as the “digital struggle,” although it has been able to create a voice in the field of psychological warfare and propaganda, lacks an executive arm in the real world of politics and security. This is why, in political analysis, this movement is often seen as a “media pressure” rather than a “political alternative” capable of managing crises in the field.
​3. Why does the world distinguish between “weapons” and “applications”?
​International politics is based on “hard power” and “effective influence.” When it comes to distributing resources or large-scale support, countries like the US look for partners with a “combat organization” and an “active social base.”
For the Kurds: Support is defined in the form of defensive and logistical means, as they are on the physical front lines.
For the monarchists: Support remains largely in the form of communication tools, satellite internet, and media platforms, as their sphere of presence has not expanded beyond the screen of a phone.