Western politicians should not compare the people of Iran with the people of Arab countries.

 

#Iran_is_a_country_With_different_nationalities

#Azari_25_millione

#kurds_18_million
#Balochs_between_8_and_9_million
#Southern_Iranian_Arabs_between_7_and_8_million
#We_have_other_nationalities_like_Gilaks_who_are_estimated_at_3_million

These nationalities mentioned above have been suppressed throughout history. Their rights have been ignored by Iranian regimes, whether the Shah's regime or the mullahs' regime. Each of these nationalities has its own language and culture. In this country, they have been prohibited from teaching in their native language by dictators.

 Western politicians should not compare the people of Iran with the people of Arab countries.
Arab people are mostly superstitious and the people of Iran are not superstitious. 

 

And the people of Iran do not need a single leader because Iran is a multinational country.
The only way to achieve freedom in Iran is that the people of Iran need a decentralized government and federal democracy. In Iran, many nationalities of this country have been brutally suppressed in the past. A federal system can solve the problems of Iranians and the people of Iran will not tolerate another dictatorship.
History has also proven what kind of political system the Iranian people want.
And the Iranian people have made great sacrifices on the way to democracy. The whole world is witnessing this. At several stages, the nation tried to overcome this regime and achieve democracy. In the uprising of the past years, it is known as the Women's Life Freedom uprising, also known as the Zhina uprising.
All these uprisings in Iran were for freedom, democracy and human dignity, but because no country stood behind the people of Iran, the regime massacred the nation with the help of foreign terrorists.
I hope that Western politicians will not make miscalculations because the people of Iran are very different from the people of Arab countries. There are many cultural, linguistic and geographical differences. The people of Iran deserve freedom, democracy and human dignity.

 a federal system for a country  as iran who living many nations is best.
A federal system can often work well for a country that contains many different nations, ethnic groups, or regions—but it is a automatically the “best” system in every case. It depends on how it is designed and how the political culture works.
What a Federal System Means
A federal system is when power is shared between a central (national) government and regional governments (states, provinces, or regions). Each level has its own responsibilities.
Examples include:
United States
Germany
India
Switzerland
Why Federalism Can Work Well for Multi-Nation Countries
Countries with many cultures or nations often use federalism because it allows local autonomy.
Advantages:
Self-government for different nations
Regions can manage their own language, culture, and education.
Reduced conflict
Groups feel less dominated by the central government.
Policies fit local needs
What works in one region may not work in another.
For example, in Switzerland different linguistic groups (German, French, Italian, Romansh) have strong cantonal autonomy.
Possible Problems
Federal systems also have challenges:
Power struggles between central and regional governments
Unequal development between regions
Sometimes strong regional nationalism can push toward independence
For example, debates about regional autonomy exist in places like India and Canada.
Key Point
A federal system works best when:
The constitution clearly divides powers
Minority rights are protected
There is trust between regions and the central government
Democratic institutions are strong
 Conclusion:
For a country with many nations or ethnic groups, federalism is often a good way to balance unity and diversity, but it must be carefully designed.
A federal system does not allow any dictatorship to grow again, and a federal system divides power among the people of a country, which means that dictatorial ideas can never grow or come to power in such a pluralistic system and suppress the people.
the difference between federal vs unitary states, or
which multi-nation countries succeed most with federalism.

By Samuel kermashani