#Misogyny and #misanthropy in the #islamic_laws of religious Sharia. A non-Muslim has half the rights of a Muslim in Sharia law. For example, if a Jew is killed, he has half the rights of a Muslim. According to Islamic law, the murderer cannot be retaliated against. However, if a Jew kills a Muslim, he must be retaliated against twice. A Christian, a Yazidi, a non-Muslim, and a Zoroastrian have half the rights of a Muslim.Hatred in the blood of Arabs and Muslims.A woman has half the rights of a man, and if a man kills a woman, the crime is not serious, but if a woman kills a man, she must be retaliated against twice.
Hatred in the blood of Arabs and Muslims" is an attempt to silence others and impose their religious views on others, and no one should say that pork is good. Let us look at the issue a little more carefully and with a more logical perspective.
Violent and violent behavior in the blood of Muslims peoples.The Muslims we interact with are mostly selfish and seek to shape their own thoughts.
Our heritage is wide and varied and as Jews we are obligated to tell and retell these amazing stories to ensure our history stays alive not only within our own people but relevant within humanity as a whole. May the people of Iran know freedom. May they along with our hostages be released from the bondage from which we are held.
Shabbat Shalom dear friends
.Turn the page and see, I wonder which sick mind wrote these laws!!!!???? A Muslim who kills a non-Muslim cannot be a Q.S.A.S. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hamidreza Goodarzi, a special investigator for the Tehran murder case and a former criminal judge, after years of work in controversial cases such as "Night Bat" and "Shahrukh and Somayeh", is now working as a lawyer in a court in Tehran. ✨️ He has established advanced courts based on a deep understanding of rights and a love of justice...In the context of reduced violence world-wide, as documented by Pinker , Islam is an exception; i.e., it is more violent than other cultures. Can contemporary cultural psychology explain aspects of this difference? It is hypothesized that violence is more frequent in cultures that are vertical collectivist than in cultures that are horizontal individualist. The paper reviews data that are generally consistent with this hypothesis. Furthermore, most Muslims are not violent, but perhaps 40 percent do engage in jihad. What personality aspects might explain this difference? It is argued that self-deception is very common among humans and the jihadists are especially susceptible to self-deception. Religion provides important benefits but it is also often related to violence. One way to reduce aspects of Islamic violence is for the West to ridicule Islam less. The paper also provides Islam with a more realistic model of its religion.


Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar