The monarchists are made up of the security and intelligence forces of the Islamic Republic itself. For example, we are publishing videos and images of these agents with this article.

 

 Shirin Ebadi was not detained in Iran for even an hour.

This is the second Khalkhali, he says he will massacre everyone. I think he is very stupid. He does not know the internal conditions of Iran and is unaware of the conditions of the region because he has been busy with pleasure and drinking for many years or has never been to know whose hands control the world until he was in Iran. He was an agent of the Ministry of Intelligence and his work was with the opposition abroad.

#Fascists_slogan

The monarchists are made up of the security and intelligence forces of the Islamic Republic itself. For example, we are publishing videos and images of these agents with this article.

 

⭕️ Pahlavi's "Committee for Drafting Transitional Justice Regulations", read "Death in Exile Commission!" It was formed on his orders!! Reza Pahlavi has no social base inside Iran, and because the main nationalities of Iran, the socialist and democratic parties of Iran are completely opposed to the disturbing and opaque thoughts of this psychopath, and there are also people around him who have been in the hands of Islamic criminals who should be legally tried and prosecuted, or who used these people as black boxes as witnesses to the successive massacres inside Iran.
Shahram Homayoun has also lost his voice due to Reza Pahlavi's childish actions
Relevant members:
• Iraj Mesdaghi, traitor, repentant and secret agent abroad, a companion of Lazurdi!
• Shirin Ebadi, a warmongering Nobelist from the branch of the sunflower-worshiping bread-eaters!

• Leila Bahmani, Iraj Mesdaghi's media lover and a mercenary expert!
• Afshin Elyan, a former Tudeh!
Mashallah Abbaszadeh is one of the jewels of the Islamic Republic, and thousands of others.
In fact, after the deep differences between the mullahs and the governments of the United States and Israel, the monarchists became a bridge for spies from both sides to infiltrate each other to obtain information.
The Islamic regime sent a number of its trained people abroad to operate under the name of monarchy and continue their espionage and sabotage activities so that they would not be prosecuted by Western governments.
Hassan Daei's talks about the nature of the Pahlavi movement in destroying other fighters and the opposition, from the slogan "Death to the three Fasads" to the destruction of Kurdish groups, on the Voice of America program Maidan
Theorist of Revolutions: Reza Pahlavi is a divisive figure.
🔰George Lawson (Theorist of Revolutions):
#Reza_Pahlavi is a divisive figure. His open hostility to a large part of the Iranian people does not make him a person who advances democracy.
It is unlikely that he will be able to build the society that most Iranians want. Reza Pahlavi is a divisive figure and nothing has been done yet.
Iraj Mesdaghi; Yesterday's Mujahid, Today's Pahlaviite.
This sentence may summarize the path that Iraj Mesdaghi's name has taken in recent years; a path that seems full of questions and contradictions to many political activists and former prisoners of the 1990s.

In a clip released of his conversation with Mehdi Falahati, the host asks a simple but very sensitive question:
"What happened, you weren't executed?"

Mesdaghi's answer is clear and significant. He says without mincing words:
“I wrote a letter of disgust.”

In the literature of the Islamic Republic’s prisons in the 1990s, a “letter of disgust” meant a declaration of acquittal from the organization and political past; a text in which a prisoner declared his distance from the organization and his previous beliefs. But Mesdagi explains later in the same interview that this alone was not enough. He says that after that, the prison authorities also wanted interviews and cooperation.

He even adds that some prisoners agreed to be interviewed or cooperated but were still executed. These same sentences have raised a serious question again: If the letter of disgust alone was not enough and interviews and cooperation were also considered after that, then what exactly did those who survived go through?

This part of Mesdagi’s words was published at the same time that images of his meeting with Reza Pahlavi were broadcast in the media, once again bringing his name to the center of political debate. For many critics, this combination seems strange: someone who was once a member of the People's Mojahedin Organization is now seen alongside currents close to Pahlavi and at the same time narrating about the past of the prisons of the 1960s.

For this reason, the release of this clip has revived an old debate. Many former political prisoners and activists of that period have been saying for years that it is not possible to narrate the history of the prisons of the 1960s without clarifying the role and behavior of everyone.

How is it that all of Pahlavi's advisors and martyrs today came from the heart of the Islamic system?!

When someone talks about that era and introduces themselves as its narrator, it is natural that their own past is also questioned:

What was written?

What interviews were conducted?

And what kind of cooperation took place?

The 1990s are still one of the darkest chapters in Iran's contemporary history. For thousands of political prisoners and the families of the victims, those years are not just a historical issue; It is a wound that has not yet healed.

 To #EbbaBusch Ebba Busch, Christian Democrats
The ideology and principles of the #Christian Democrats state this
Solidarity can be defined as humanity and love based on the golden rule: treat others as you would like to be treated. We want to protect the lives, freedom and dignity of all people – regardless of geographical distance. We want to stand in solidarity with the weak and the oppressed. We call this the principle of solidarity.
Despite this, a party leader stands on the barricades and chants in support of the son of Iran's last Shah, Reza Pahlavi. A person who has never clearly distanced himself from the torture and executions that the Iranian people were subjected to during the monarchy. At the same time, parts of his circle and supporters openly threaten other Iranians who do not share their political vision.
At the same time, we see how parts of his supporters openly threaten other Iranians who do not share their political vision. In free Europe, there has also been harassment and violence against Iranians who prefer a republic to a monarchy.
I would therefore like to remind Ebba Busch of something fundamental. When you stand in front of hundreds of people and symbolically place Reza Pahlavi on a throne, you are also sending a political message.
You cannot hide behind a “good cause” when the stage belongs to a movement that openly shows contempt for democratic principles. An elected politician is responsible for the forces she legitimizes.
Speaking at a demonstration organized by an authoritarian movement is not a miss in the calendar. It is a political choice. And democratic voters have the right to ask why.
Solidarity is never an excuse for lending your vote to forces that want to concentrate all power in one hand. Democracy requires better judgment than that.
When opinion figures fall, politicians’ backbone is tested. If you seek support from anti-democratic forces for cheap applause, then the problem is bigger than a single speech. In plain language, one risks fishing for votes at the expense of the Iranian people.
A responsible politician must know who is holding the megaphone. Sharing the stage with the enemies of democracy and then referring to the “large audience” is not enough.
Ebba Busch, you offend me.

 

 VIDEO: Rights activist Shadi Amin #shadiamin6) says:

Reza Pahlavi is a symbol of division among the Iranian opposition, and his actions are helping the regime stay in power longer.

Sexy need fuck of

 Brian Amini  @LibertyFighterV  
Says about this Iranian protest :
“ they are not protesting for the freedom of the Iranian people. They are in the streets to restore the monarchy and to bring the son of Iran’s former Shah to power. This is essentially a campaign to crown the Shah’s son.


They do not represent all the people of Iran; they only represent monarchists. You can see this clearly from the placards they are holding.”Ehsan Hosseinzadeh (@Ehsan_HoZa) says:

These people are supporters of Reza Pahlavi & they do not represent all Iranians.

📌" If Iran falls into the hands of these monarchists and Reza Pahlavi after the Islamic Republic collapses, the country will face dark days. "  

 

 

 Video: A restaurant owned by a supporter of Reza Pahlavi displays a banner on the wall that reads: “Mullahs, Leftists, and Mojahedin cannot enter this restaurant, but dogs can.”

This is part of a slogan that has also been used many times by Yasmine Pahlavi (the wife of Reza Pahlavi) on her Instagram page.

Many people say this slogan is dividing the Iranian opposition, but Pahlavi supporters and his wife are ignoring these concerns.

Leftist groups make up a large part of the opposition to the Iranian regime, and the Mojahedin-e Khalq are also one of the largest Iranian opposition groups. For many years they have opposed the regime, and more than 5,000 of their members have been executed by the Iranian regime.

The full slogan used by Yasmine Pahlavi on her Instagram page is: